Facebook privacy issues: Consumers rank Facebook last among social media sites

Facebook has had a busy couple weeks. Between back-to-back hearings on Capitol Hill last week and new questions from the European courts this week, the social media behemoth is getting its fair share of regulator attention, negative press, and user complaints.

One of the main spotlights is on Facebook’s privacy policy, especially after the Cambridge Analytica scandal news broke. However, the company’s less-than-stellar record with customer privacy has long been an issue.

Facebook has always struggled with satisfying customers – particularly in the privacy department — according to eight years of customer satisfaction research. When looking at its ability to protect the privacy of personal information, Facebook ranks dead last, which is likely due to its revenue goals encroaching on customer privacy. The second worst, LinkedIn, scores a full 11 percent higher than Facebook.

Overall, Facebook is one of the lowest-ranked companies among e-business sites, scoring a 68 out of 100 — and that’s before the last six months of negative press.

For reference, the social media industry average score is 73.

ACSI-social-media-site-scores-2017Overall ACSI customer satisfaction scores for social media sites as of July 2017.

Across all industries, a key driver of satisfaction is maintaining privacy of information. However, people also value convenience and Facebook is engrained into the social fabric of our lives. Users haven’t changed their privacy settings, and even Facebook’s stock has risen – but not recovered – since Zuckerberg’s testimony to Congress.

Facebook may be too large to be quashed by these recent privacy fumbles, but its satisfaction score can – and likely will – take a hit. It’s certainly a warning to all companies in privacy management: Customers expect their information to be secure.

We’ll take a closer look at social media website scores this summer, but for now, take a deeper dive into the most recent customer satisfaction data with more insights on this industry.

 

Customer satisfaction with hospitals grows as health care sector shifts

One word defines health care right now: consolidation.

Pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) are merging with insurers. United Health Group led the charge a few years ago, buying Catamaran. Now CVS is buying Aetna and Cigna is buying Express Scripts. Walmart is in talks to buy Humana. Some see this as motivated by the potential for Amazon to leap into the health care space; the major players are joining forces to ensure they’ll be able to compete.

But the joining of PBMs with insurers could have an effect on hospitals as well.

UnitedHealth bought Surgical Care Affiliates to expand into primary and urgent care in ambulances, and picked up a physician group, moving closer to direct delivery of medical care. CVS and Aetna plan to add community medical clinics to their repertoire. Walmart already operates retail health clinics and has said it would begin offering lab-testing services in some stores.

The $18 billion urgent care center space is expected to grow nearly 6 percent in 2018, building on the more than 7,600 urgent care centers in the U.S. as of June 2017. The number of centers in 2017 was up nearly 10 percent over 2015.

The surge in clinics could be the reason that customer satisfaction with emergency room services jumped 6 percent since last year, to an ACSI score of 73.

That was the most dramatic change in the health care and social assistance sector, and drove the 1.3 percent increase in customer satisfaction with hospitals.

Inpatient hospital care saw a 1 percent rise to an ACSI score of 77. The gains in ER and inpatient care helped offset a decline for outpatient care, which ebbed 3 percent to 78.

Patient satisfaction with ambulatory care (office visits to doctors, dentists, optometrists, and mental health professionals) held steady at 77 for the third year in a row.

Among patients 51 years and up, satisfaction with hospitals was much higher, at a score of 80, than among those 18-50 years old, where it stood at just 72. The difference in satisfaction between the two age groups was most pronounced in outpatient care and emergency room services, where ACSI scores among those 51 and up were 10 points higher than scores for those 18-50.

It will be interesting to see the effect that continued growth of urgent care clinics will have on ER perception moving forward. And when Amazon, along with its collaborators JPMorgan Chase and Berkshire Hathaway, does make moves in health care, it will be anyone’s guess how the health care and social assistance sector, and patients’ satisfaction with its services, will respond.

UPS tops FedEx in customer satisfaction, as Amazon appears on the horizon

Amazon overshadows many industries, as we saw last month in the retail sector. Now, consumer shipping, long the beneficiary of all those Amazon orders, is bracing for a future in which Amazon makes its own deliveries.

The Wall Street Journal last month reported that Amazon is planning to launch “Shipping with Amazon,” a delivery service for businesses shipping to consumers. Of course it would take years for Amazon to build a parcel delivery network at the scale of United Parcel Service (UPS) and FedEx, but even the specter of Amazon should be enough for the established players in the shipping industry to redouble their efforts in serving customers.

Where do they stand right now?

Customer satisfaction with consumer shipping was stable at an ACSI score of 81 (out of 100), but UPS jumped into the lead at 82, growing 1 percent over 2017. FedEx fell 1 percent to 81. The U.S. Postal Service’s Express and Priority Mail business climbed 1 percent, but remains a distant third place at 76.

Customers gave top marks to shippers for delivering packages in good condition (88) and making it easy to track shipments (86). Customers who visited a post office or a UPS or FedEx store feel that service staff members were slightly less courteous and helpful this year (85), but all other customer experience benchmarks remained the same.

It might seem easy to write off the U.S. Postal Service’s Express and Priority Mail business, which remains well behind the category’s leaders in terms of overall customer satisfaction. But it’s actually tied with FedEx in customer loyalty and has a lower percentage of customer complaints. UPS had the best scores in the industry for each of those measures.

With Amazon dipping its toes in the shipping space and, according to the Wall Street Journal, threatening to undercut UPS and FedEx pricing, the shipping giants can only rely on their established infrastructure so long. Investing in customer service could continue to set these companies apart.

Drug store mergers heat up as retailers defend against the Amazon threat

Among retailers, health and personal care stores were one of the bright spots in our latest Retail Report 2017.

Just like supermarkets, health and personal care stores climbed one point to an ACSI score of 79. While that doesn’t match the 82 of internet retailers, it’s a high score, and the improvement points to the results of both M&A and preparations for Amazon to enter the space.

But that vote of confidence from customers is just the prelude to a shake up that the industry’s many mergers are creating.

The leaders shed points, but still lead

Kmart pharmacies and Kroger were tied at a score of 80 at the top of the health and personal care industry. However, both saw their ACSI score fall in 2017, with Kmart pharmacies shedding 4 points and Kroger down 1 point. Kmart pharmacies did show significant improvement in service quality, and both brands improved in meeting customer expectations.

CVS customer satisfaction powered by and preparing for mergers

CVS was right behind the leaders at a company-best 78. It was the most improved in the category, gaining 2 points, and one of only two large chains to improve over 2016.

Acquiring Target pharmacies may have boosted CVS’s customer satisfaction scores. When dividing CVS’s score into CVS and Target pharmacies, Target stands at a score of 80, while CVS sits at 77.

The health care retailer’s possible merger with Aetna is suspected to be a preemptive move to counter the threat of Amazon, which may begin selling prescription medicine. Whether this merger will boost customer satisfaction – or even go through – remains to be seen.

Rite Aid split among Albertsons and Walgreens

Rite Aid, which fell 1 point in 2017 to a score of 77, is in the middle of being purchased.

Walgreens is snatching up 1,932 Rite Aids (it tried to buy all of them before antitrust scrutiny led to a scaled-back deal). And now Albertsons plans to buy the remaining 2,500 Rite Aids, further expanding its footprint after merging with Safeway in 2015.

It seems many of the health and personal care stores toward the bottom of the ACSI rankings are banding together in hopes of better serving customers and getting ahead of Amazon’s potential entrance in the market.

Walgreens gained a point in 2017 to tie Rite Aid at 77. Safeway pharmacies was just a point higher at 78 after plummeting five points from last year, a drop of 6 percent. Declines in customer loyalty and perceived value contributed to the fall.

Perhaps the many mergers and acquisitions will give these stores more resources to improve customer satisfaction.

The elephant in the room

In the end, M&A in the health and personal care space, as well as the improvements in service quality and meeting customer expectations, are all about Amazon. The potential for the dominant internet retailer to enter the space and push out any and all competitors has many companies making big moves to shore up their ranks.

If Amazon steps into the space, a focus on customer satisfaction will be critical to winning customer loyalty and dollars.

3 ways financial advisors can hold onto customers despite market volatility

The stock market’s rocky start to February has investors, observers, and advisors watching the peaks and valleys and wondering what’s next.

At least for financial advisors, there are a few steps forward in the latest ACSI data around customer satisfaction.

The ACSI Financial Advisors Report 2017 collected data in the fourth quarter of 2017 and reflects customer perceptions when the stock market was still soaring. As you might expect, the scores were high. The average of 81 (out of 100) places it in the top 10 industries measured by the ACSI.

But it also contains opportunities for advisors to differentiate themselves and rise above their competitors, something especially crucial if market volatility remains a trend.

Currently, the major financial advisors have ACSI scores within a few points of each other. LPL Financial and Charles Schwab lead the pack with a score of 82, while Fidelity, Merrill Lynch, and UBS all have the lowest score of 79.

The narrow range shows how competitive the industry is right now and how small, incremental changes can help advisors stand out. Here are three ways to improve customer satisfaction, according to the data:

1. Focus on improving customer service.

Despite the relatively high scores for financial advisors overall, they also have the fourth highest complaint rate of any industry measured by the ACSI – a red flag of negative feedback from customers experiencing problems.

This is probably the biggest opportunity for financial advisors to set themselves apart. A concerted effort to improve service – whether through more face-to-face contact or instantaneous chat capabilities on a website — could increase customer satisfaction and loyalty.

2. Develop or upgrade mobile options.

Mobile options for account management had one of the lowest scores among all the benchmarks, coming in at 78.

While the industry has to contend with compliance constraints, a push behind better mobile capabilities could set advisors apart and give them a technological lead over their competitors.

3. Establish routine contact with investors.

Scores for routine contact with investors (81) and personal contact (79) were two others with lower scores among financial advisors.

Investors will likely have questions about the recent volatility in the markets, making this a prime opportunity for improvement. By taking a more proactive approach to client communication, advisors can not only help clients navigate a suddenly shaky market, but develop relationships with customers that could weather further market volatility.

How customers feel about their financial advisors

While these steps are a start, we’ll have to wait and see how the markets fare in the coming weeks and months.

We’ll closely monitor the perceptions of customers and see whether the high ACSI scores for financial advisors hold up even if the big upticks we saw in 2017 don’t materialize in 2018.

Take a deeper dive into all the customer satisfaction data for financial advisors for more insights on this segment of the market.

Love or hate Trump, government satisfaction just hit an 11-year high

Customer satisfaction for U.S. federal government services just hit an 11-year high. Yes, you read that right.

If you watch the news, skim the headlines, or scroll through Facebook, you’ve probably noticed that people have wildly different perceptions of how well the government is working.

But as far as customer service is concerned, many Americans agree: The federal government is much better than it was just a few years ago, and is the best it’s been since 2006.

Just a few hours before President Trump gives his first State of the Union address, the economy appears to be flourishing and GDP is rising. But there are other measures of success to factor in. Let’s look at a few.

“Customers” are satisfied with the government

Citizens using the government’s services are happy with their experience, according to our most recent data. In fact, customer satisfaction with the federal government’s services improved for a second year in a row, increasing 2.5 percent to reach 69.7 (on a 100 point scale).

Four key factors drive satisfaction:

  1. Quality of federal websites (up 1 percent to 77)
  2. Courtesy and professionalism of customer service personnel (down 1 percent to 77)
  3. Clarity and accessibility of information received from agencies (up 1 percent to 73)
  4. Timeliness and efficiency of government processes (up 3 percent to 72)

Last year, the federal government’s website performance saw the highest gain, but customer service was the highest-ranking factor in overall customer satisfaction. This year they tie as the most important indicator for happiness.

Political affiliation doesn’t matter

You may think that customer satisfaction with the government directly correlates to political affiliation. The party in power surely must impact the overall consumer satisfaction rate.

But, surprisingly, you’d be wrong.

In fact, satisfaction among Republicans dropped over the past year (1 percent decrease to 69), and it remained unchanged (73) among Democrats. Independents shifted the most, with a 3 percent gain to 67.

The ACSI survey doesn’t measure satisfaction with government policy and leadership, instead relying on the four factors above to analyze interactions and determine the scores. But it’s still interesting that affiliation and opinions on the administration didn’t appear to muddy consumers’ perceptions of the processes and services they received.

Not all government services are created equal

While customer satisfaction with the federal government overall has been climbing, there’s varying opinion of which government services are most customer-friendly.
The Departments of Justice and Interior performed particularly well this year (81 and 78 respectively), while the Departments of the Treasury and Housing and Urban Development were at the bottom of the spectrum (61 and 60 respectively). The IRS is included in the Treasury Department, which will be interesting to watch now that the tax overhaul is in effect — both from the perspective of lowering costs as well as simplifying the process, which historically results in higher satisfaction.

The 21-point gap between the highest and lowest performing departments is significant, but not unusual or unexpected. The 69.7 average means consumers are getting what they need and are relatively satisfied, but there’s room for improvement.
Private companies still reign supreme

While almost 70 percent doesn’t seem too bad for a customer satisfaction score, the government still falls short of the private sector.

For example, credit unions have a high customer satisfaction level (82), as do the banking and shipping industries (81). Many other private companies are in the low-to-mid-70 range, putting the federal government’s report card on the lower end of all industries the ACSI surveys. In fact, only subscription TV services rank lower than government services, at 64.

Based on historical data, the government is always at or near the bottom of the ACSI. This isn’t a new finding, but it is significant in the context of customer perception.

What to watch moving forward

Tonight’s State of the Union should give insight into the government’s priorities for the next year and what we might expect for major projects and policies.

But a more politically polarized country and low approval ratings for President Trump don’t necessarily translate into a change in the ACSI report. However, if there are positive changes to government websites and the friendliness of service-oriented staff, we could continue to see the upward shift in customer satisfaction.

Bank Customer Satisfaction Offers Challenge to Credit Unions

Customers are finding retail bank services more satisfying in 2017—so much so that banks hit an all-time industry high score on the American Customer Satisfaction Index that is close to approximating member satisfaction with credit unions. Historically, banks were once among the lower-scoring industries in the ACSI, but now they are in the top quartile for customer satisfaction.

In 2008, credit unions debuted in the ACSI with a score that nearly topped all other industries in the Index. At 84 on the ACSI’s 100-point scale, credit unions came in second only to personal care and cleaning products (85) and were ahead of retail banks by a whopping 9 points. Now 10 years later, retail banks score 81, trailing credit unions (82) by just a point.

Digital banking plays a strong role in helping banks meet their customers’ needs more efficiently. As mobile banking grows in popularity, customers choosing to use apps can have a satisfying experience—leaving more time for bank staff and tellers to offer a personal touch for those who continue to do their banking in-branch.

Size still matters when it comes to satisfying bank customers, and smaller community and regional banks continue to offer an experience that beats both super regional and national banks. With an ACSI score of 85, small banks are significantly ahead of credit unions as well.

Credit unions and smaller banks show similar ACSI results across key elements of the customer experience and for the most part exceed the performance level of the larger banking institutions. With more personalized service, small institutions score better than big banks for staff courtesy, transaction speed, account information, ease of making account changes, and competitiveness of interest rates. The exceptions are number and locations of branches and ATMs, where the scale of big banks comes into play.

As credit union membership grows, however, the industry may be struggling with maintaining the very high level of service that once set it apart from big banks. Looking at some of the touch points where small institutions typically shine, it is interesting to note that big banks are closing the gap to credit unions over the past two years. In 2015, for example, national banks trailed credit unions by 7 points for transaction speed, but this has lessened to 3 points this year. For staff courtesy, the gap between national banks and credit unions has gone from 5 to 3 points. A similar pattern prevails for both website and call center satisfaction.

ACSI Finance and Insurance Report 2017 »

Credit Union Times: Digital Banking FI Customer Satisfaction Reaches New High »

KOMO News: Customer Satisfaction With Banks at All-Time High »

PCs Follow Negative Trend for Big-Ticket Durables

American consumers are not finding new technology appealing enough to offset pricing across an array of durable products including personal computers, autos, household appliances, and even televisions. For PCs, weak demand is reflected in lower customer satisfaction (-1.3% to 77) as many customers turn increasingly to smartphone use.

For durable products like PCs, prices are not down—if anything, they are rising. The global shortage of NAND flash storage caused an uptick in PC prices, which also contributes to lower satisfaction. But innovation—or lack thereof—is dampening buyer enthusiasm whereby consumers have little incentive to replace or upgrade their PCs. Over the last few years, basic desktop and laptop functionality has not changed much, and innovation is moving more slowly around the margins.

Among PC makers, the top of the industry for customer satisfaction is driven by Apple and Samsung—mirroring results for the cell phone category. High-scoring Apple has led the PC industry for years, while Samsung, first measured in 2015, has sprinted up to nearly catch the leader. The two companies’ cell phone offerings also run nearly neck-and-neck, and some of their individual smartphone brands earn very high scores in the upper 80s. In ACSI’s smartphone brand study released last spring, Apple’s iPhone SE ranks first among 20+ phones at 87, followed by Galaxy S6 edge+ (86), iPhone 7 Plus (86), and Galaxy S6 edge (85).

On the computer software side, customer satisfaction wanes 3.7% to 78 as both smaller companies and Microsoft tumble—the latter declining even as it transforms into a supplier of cloud-based services. Despite MS increasing the frequency of feature updates, both Windows and the Office Suite have yet to give users improvements that are compelling enough to propel higher satisfaction.

KOMO News: Study: Computer Users No Longer Wowed by Hardware or Software »

The Motley Fool: People Are Less Happy With Their Computers »

Toyota Snags Double Win in Customer Satisfaction Ratings

Toyota headlines the automobile industry when it comes to customer satisfaction, earning the top spot among both luxury and mass-market brands in this year’s American Customer Satisfaction Index. Toyota’s Lexus is the luxury leader at 86 (100-point scale), followed by an improved Mercedes-Benz at 84. For mass-market plates, Toyota’s namesake brand comes in first with an equally high score of 86, with Subaru closing in at 85.

General Motors is the only domestic automaker in the top five overall, with its GMC nameplate grabbing third place at a stable score of 84. Among luxury plates, two domestic offerings tie for third: GM’s Cadillac and Ford’s Lincoln. For the former, 2017 is a comeback year as Cadillac gains 5% to earn its berth on the leader board. Not so for Lincoln, which tumbles after holding first place among all vehicles a year ago—down 5% from 87 to tie with Cadillac (83).

While the overall trend for autos in 2017 is one of receding satisfaction, Toyota brands are on an upswing. Likewise, Korea’s Hyundai earns a slot at number four among mass-market cars with a 2% gain. In fact, five of the six top-scoring mass-market vehicles are imports, and all show ACSI gains.

Historically, Toyota has been a consistent leader in customer satisfaction. For three years running, the Japanese carmaker has placed in the top two among mass-market cars, while its Lexus nameplate hit number one in 2015 and tied for third in 2016 among upscale vehicles.

Toyota, Lexus, Autos: 5-year ACSI Trends

Read More »

24/7 Wall St.: Best and Worst Car Brands of 2017 »

Carscoops: Toyota Takes Top Spot In Latest American Customer Satisfaction Index »